Contacts
Research Projects
Gallery
Publications
Methodological Developments
Group Members
About the PI
Jobs and Positions
Useful Links

 


Methodological Developments

SSBP and GSBP

A description in which all atomic and structural details of the solvent molecules are ignored (as in PB calculations) may not always be desirable. In some cases, it may be advantageous to use an intermediate approach which consists in keeping a small number of explicit solvent molecules in the vicinity of the solute, and representing the remaining bulk with an effective solvent boundary potential.

Separating the multidimensional solute-solvent configurational integral in terms of "inner'' solvent molecules nearest to an arbitrary solute, and the remaining "outer'' bulk solvent molecules, we showed that the solvent boundary potential corresponds to the solvation free energy of an effective cluster comprising the solute and inner explicit solvent molecules embedded in a large hard sphere (Beglov and Roux,1994). The hard sphere corresponds to a configurational restriction on the outer bulk solvent molecules; its radius is variable, such that it includes the most distant inner solvent molecule. An approximate Spherical Solvent Boundary Potential, called SSBP, based on this formulation was shown to yield accurate results in computer simulations. SSBP is meant to simulate solutes surrounded by bulk isotropic solvent. To simulate a small region of a protein or active site, the Generalized Solvent Boundary Potential, called GSBP, was developed. To properly equilibrate a finite region with GSBP, a grand canonical monte carlo GCMC can be used. These methods have been implemented in CHARMM .

Download:

Electrostatic solvation free energy of alanine dipeptide in water using SSBP

Electrostatic free energy of aspartic acid in aspartyl-t-RNA synthase using GSBP

Basic GCMC examples with water (more in GSBP downloads)

 

 

BP